jili super ace app download apk old version

Osun gov lauds efforts to improve education infrastructure

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 22, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Law Practice AI is at the forefront of a groundbreaking revolution in legal case management, reshaping how law firms handle complex tasks by leveraging the power of Artificial Intelligence (AI). With its innovative platform, Law Practice AI automates labor-intensive processes, empowering legal professionals to focus on strategy, analysis, and delivering superior client service. AI-Powered Efficiency: Transforming Legal Case Management Law Practice AI's platform simplifies and accelerates case management by automating document review, case tracking, and research. By streamlining these traditionally time-consuming tasks, law firms can reduce operational costs and eliminate errors that arise from manual data handling. The result is a faster, more efficient legal workflow that enhances productivity and increases client satisfaction. "Law Practice AI has transformed legal case management by automating repetitive tasks, allowing attorneys to focus on high-value work. This boosts efficiency and ensures clients receive top-tier service. We also recognize the importance of ethical concerns around AI, which is why our platform prioritizes privacy, security, and compliance, with encryption and stringent access controls built into every layer," says Hamid Kohan , Founder and CEO of Law Practice AI. AI and Ethics in Law: Prioritizing Privacy and Regulatory Compliance In an industry where privacy and ethics are paramount, Law Practice AI remains dedicated to responsible AI innovation. The platform adheres to strict privacy and regulatory compliance standards, safeguarding sensitive client information and maintaining ethical practices in every aspect of its service. Expanding Horizons: Law Practice AI Leads the Way in AI-Driven Legal Tech Looking ahead, Law Practice AI continues to expand its platform to meet the evolving needs of the legal sector. By integrating cutting-edge AI technologies such as predictive analytics and natural language processing (NLP), the platform is poised to offer broader solutions, including AI-assisted legal research, automated contract generation, and enhanced client communication tools. About Law Practice AI Law Practice AI is on a mission to reshape the legal landscape by harnessing the full power of Artificial Intelligence. Our team of legal and technology experts dive deep into the intricacies of the law, leveraging advanced AI technologies to deliver solutions that improve efficiency, accuracy, and client satisfaction. We are introducing law firms to a new era of smart, precise, and efficient legal services. For media inquiries, please contact: Law Practice AI , powered by Legal Soft Address: 21731 Ventura Blvd. #100 Woodland Hills CA 91364 Phone: 209-500-3033 Email: Sales@mylawfirm.ai Visit us on social media: Facebook Instagram Linkedin X.com

Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. acquired a new stake in shares of Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. ( NASDAQ:IBKR – Free Report ) in the third quarter, Holdings Channel reports. The fund acquired 1,645 shares of the financial services provider’s stock, valued at approximately $229,000. A number of other institutional investors have also recently added to or reduced their stakes in the stock. Prime Capital Investment Advisors LLC lifted its stake in Interactive Brokers Group by 3.7% in the third quarter. Prime Capital Investment Advisors LLC now owns 2,746 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $383,000 after buying an additional 97 shares during the last quarter. Boston Financial Mangement LLC increased its holdings in shares of Interactive Brokers Group by 5.4% in the 3rd quarter. Boston Financial Mangement LLC now owns 1,955 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $272,000 after acquiring an additional 100 shares during the period. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. boosted its stake in Interactive Brokers Group by 5.6% during the 3rd quarter. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. now owns 2,007 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $280,000 after purchasing an additional 107 shares during the period. Tortoise Investment Management LLC boosted its stake in Interactive Brokers Group by 76.6% during the 2nd quarter. Tortoise Investment Management LLC now owns 256 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $31,000 after purchasing an additional 111 shares during the period. Finally, Signaturefd LLC grew its position in Interactive Brokers Group by 9.5% in the 3rd quarter. Signaturefd LLC now owns 1,359 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $189,000 after purchasing an additional 118 shares during the last quarter. 23.80% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors. Wall Street Analyst Weigh In A number of equities research analysts have recently weighed in on the company. Piper Sandler reaffirmed an “overweight” rating and set a $163.00 price target on shares of Interactive Brokers Group in a report on Wednesday, October 16th. UBS Group lifted their target price on Interactive Brokers Group from $155.00 to $170.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research note on Tuesday, October 8th. Jefferies Financial Group increased their price target on Interactive Brokers Group from $152.00 to $165.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Friday, October 4th. Finally, Barclays cut their price objective on shares of Interactive Brokers Group from $166.00 to $165.00 and set an “overweight” rating on the stock in a research note on Wednesday, October 16th. One analyst has rated the stock with a hold rating and eight have given a buy rating to the company. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, the stock currently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $143.00. Interactive Brokers Group Stock Down 0.0 % Shares of Interactive Brokers Group stock opened at $191.62 on Friday. The business has a fifty day simple moving average of $154.06 and a 200-day simple moving average of $133.41. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has a fifty-two week low of $72.60 and a fifty-two week high of $193.21. The firm has a market cap of $80.96 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 29.25, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 1.45 and a beta of 0.79. Interactive Brokers Group ( NASDAQ:IBKR – Get Free Report ) last issued its quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, October 15th. The financial services provider reported $1.75 earnings per share for the quarter, missing analysts’ consensus estimates of $1.78 by ($0.03). Interactive Brokers Group had a net margin of 7.89% and a return on equity of 4.83%. The business had revenue of $2.45 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $1.32 billion. During the same period in the previous year, the company posted $1.55 earnings per share. Analysts anticipate that Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. will post 6.82 earnings per share for the current fiscal year. Interactive Brokers Group Announces Dividend The firm also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, December 13th. Investors of record on Friday, November 29th will be issued a dividend of $0.25 per share. This represents a $1.00 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 0.52%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Friday, November 29th. Interactive Brokers Group’s payout ratio is 15.27%. About Interactive Brokers Group ( Free Report ) Interactive Brokers Group, Inc operates as an automated electronic broker worldwide. The company engages in the execution, clearance, and settlement of trades in stocks, options, futures, foreign exchange instruments, bonds, mutual funds, exchange traded funds (ETFs), precious metals, and cryptocurrencies. Featured Articles Want to see what other hedge funds are holding IBKR? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. ( NASDAQ:IBKR – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Interactive Brokers Group Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Interactive Brokers Group and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Liverpool have a psychological advantage in the title race and can truly stake their claim as favourites by capitalising on their rivals' weaknesses over the coming weeks in the Premier League , Reds expert David Lynch has argued. Following Manchester City 's devastating 4-0 loss against Tottenham Hotspur on Saturday , Arne Slot 's Merseysiders have the chance to extend their lead over the champions to eight points when they face Southampton at St Mary's stadium on Sunday . Victory would also see the Reds go nine points ahead of Arsenal , who beat Nottingham Forest 3-0 on Saturday afternoon. Liverpool are set to host Pep Guardiola 's side at Anfield on December 1, and Lynch believes that Slot's team have the opportunity to put significant pressure on their rivals, telling Sports Mole : "[Liverpool will] be thinking that they can extend the lead because City and Arsenal are wobbling. "If you can just keep your noses in front at all times, it gives you that extra confidence and it also puts the scoreboard pressure on your title rivals. "It starts to come to the point where Liverpool can relax. [They've] got this gap, [they're] not playing under massive pressure. [They] can play [their] football and be open and take risks at times, whereas Manchester City and Arsenal, if [they] drop points again, [they're] done, [they're] out of it. There's a psychological element that will play on the other title rivals." Interestingly, despite boasting a remarkable 28 points from a possible 33, Liverpool collected the same number of points from the corresponding fixtures in 2023-24. The Reds have scored 19 goals and conceded on six occasions under Slot in their games against the teams Jurgen Klopp 's side faced last season, and though they have conceded four goals fewer, they have also scored seven fewer as well. While some might point to those statistics and suggest that Liverpool could yet slip up in the title race this term, it is important to note that the Reds are performing considerably better in several other underlying metrics. For instance, Liverpool faced 1.2 xG per 90 in 2023-24 but have only faced 0.85 per 90 this campaign, and this figure is the best in the entire division. Lynch expressed his belief to Sports Mole that fans should not necessarily be surprised by the position that the Reds find themselves in, saying: "Liverpool were very good last season. People forget they were top of the table after 30 games. "I think because of the way it panned out in the end people forget they were involved in the title race. It almost gets talked about as if it was just Arsenal and Manchester City. "[Liverpool] were doing a bit of a high wire act at times [in 2023-24]: 'we'll score four, you score three' approach to games, and that was quite tiring for them. So being on par with last season is no bad thing." Should Liverpool defeat Southampton and win against City at Anfield in the following matchweek, then they would be 11 points clear of Guardiola's side after just 13 games. The Merseysiders are the only team to have won a league title other than the Citizens in the past seven seasons, ending the 2019-20 campaign on 99 points, 18 ahead of City. Every time Guardiola's side have participated in a competitive title race, his team have come out on top, and perhaps Slot's best chance of overcoming his Spanish counterpart would be to build an unassailable lead. Arsenal could yet re-enter the race, especially given they have already played several of the league's best away from home, but it would likely take a near-perfect season from now on for the Gunners to finish first. Lynch highlighted his belief that should Liverpool avoid dropping points against opponents that they would normally be expected to beat, then winning the Premier League is a distinct possibility considering the early advantage the Reds have over their rivals. When speaking about the position the club find themselves in, Lynch told Sports Mole : "[Liverpool] have got to avoid [dropping points] towards the end [of the season]. "It's a Liverpool side that's going to pick up an awful lot of points, and again, the upside is that you see a Manchester City and Arsenal that are unable to match what they did last season. "If that theme continues throughout the season, then Liverpool will, I'm not going to say run away with it, but they'll be right up there and should probably win it." Sports Mole editor Barney Corkhill spoke with Liverpool expert David Lynch to discuss Liverpool's next set of fixtures, and the advantages that they hold over Manchester City and Arsenal. Press play on the video at the top of this article to hear the full discussion.

Delaware judge reaffirms ruling that invalidated massive Tesla pay package for Elon MuskMoney can’t buy happiness or a presidential election. Democratic donors just learned that the hard way. After a candidate loses a high-profile, competitive race, the blame game begins. There are many places to point the finger when assessing Vice President Kamala Harris’ run. She entered the race late and only after President Joe Biden had a career-ending debate implosion. She didn’t run a primary gauntlet, which meant voters didn’t know her very well. Having to endure even a token primary may have helped her improve her interview skills. She struggled to separate herself from the failed policies of the Biden-Harris administration. She took a number of radical positions when running for president in 2019. The Trump campaign effectively used her own words to show voters that she was a radical leftist. But one common excuse for political failure, a lack of funding, doesn’t apply. Harris spent an astonishing $1.5 billion during her 15-week campaign. That works out to around $100 million a week. But even that understates her financial resources. When combined with Biden’s fundraising, the two Democratic campaigns had more than $2.1 billion, according to The New York Times. The Times reported the Trump campaign and Republican Party raised $1.2 billion. Money is certainly an important factor in political races. But the election results show its limits. “There is not a single expenditure in a different spot that would have changed the outcome of the race,” Bakari Sellers, a close ally of Harris, told the Times. Instead, “we had so much money it was hard to get it out the door.” Perhaps this explains why the Harris campaign spent millions on celebrity performances and social media influencers. It even paid $900,000 to advertise on the Las Vegas Sphere. All this is especially ironic given the progressive battle to limit free speech by restricting political expenditures. The far-left Brennan Center for Justice says it’s committed to a “long-term push to overturn Citizens United,” in which the Supreme Court affirmed that arbitrary limits on political spending ran afoul of the Bill of Rights. During oral arguments, the government admitted that the law in question would potentially allow federal regulators to ban books. Ouch. Despite the massive fundraising numbers, Axios reported recently that the Harris campaign is likely to conclude with “millions of dollars in debt.” There’s an old adage about politicians not being responsible with other people’s money. That’s certainly true when it comes to taxpayer dollars. In Harris’ case, it applied to her donors as well. They may have been costly, but the Harris campaign has provided the American public with valuable lessons.By ROB GILLIES, Associated Press TORONTO (AP) — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told Donald Trump that Americans would also suffer if the president-elect follows through on a plan to impose sweeping tariffs on Canadian products , a Canadian minister who attended their recent dinner said Monday. Trump threatened to impose tariffs on products from Canada and Mexico if they don’t stop what he called the flow of drugs and migrants across their borders with the United States. He said on social media last week that he would impose a 25% tax on all products entering the U.S. from Canada and Mexico as one of his first executive orders. Canadian Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc, whose responsibilities include border security, attended a dinner with Trump and Trudeau at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club on Friday. Trudeau requested the meeting in a bid to avoid the tariffs by convincing Trump that the northern border is nothing like the U.S. southern border with Mexico . “The prime minister of course spoke about the importance of protecting the Canadian economy and Canadian workers from tariffs, but we also discussed with our American friends the negative impact that those tariffs could have on their economy, on affordability in the United States as well,” LeBlanc said in Parliament. If Trump makes good on his threat to slap 25% tariffs on everything imported from Mexico and Canada, the price increases that could follow will collide with his campaign promise to give American families a break from inflation. Economists say companies would have little choice but to pass along the added costs, dramatically raising prices for food, clothing, automobiles, alcohol and other goods. The Produce Distributors Association, a Washington trade group, said last week that tariffs will raise prices for fresh fruit and vegetables and hurt U.S. farmers when the countries retaliate. Canada is already examining possible retaliatory tariffs on certain items from the U.S. should Trump follow through on the threat. After his dinner with Trump, Trudeau returned home without assurances the president-elect will back away from threatened tariffs on all products from the major American trading partner. Trump called the talks “productive” but signaled no retreat from a pledge that Canada says unfairly lumps it in with Mexico over the flow of drugs and migrants into the United States. “The idea that we came back empty handed is completely false,” LeBlanc said. “We had a very productive discussion with Mr. Trump and his future Cabinet secretaries. ... The commitment from Mr. Trump to continue to work with us was far from empty handed.” Joining Trump and Trudeau at dinner were Howard Lutnick, Trump’s nominee for commerce secretary, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, Trump’s pick to lead the Interior Department, and Mike Waltz, Trump’s choice to be his national security adviser. Canada’s ambassador to the U.S., Kirsten Hillman, told The Associated Press on Sunday that “the message that our border is so vastly different than the Mexican border was really understood.” Hillman, who sat at an adjacent table to Trudeau and Trump, said Canada is not the problem when it comes to drugs and migrants. On Monday, Mexico’s president rejected those comments. “Mexico must be respected, especially by its trading partners,” President Claudia Sheinbaum said. She said Canada had its own problems with fentanyl consumption and “could only wish they had the cultural riches Mexico has.” Flows of migrants and seizures of drugs at the two countries’ border are vastly different. U.S. customs agents seized 43 pounds of fentanyl at the Canadian border during the last fiscal year, compared with 21,100 pounds at the Mexican border. Most of the fentanyl reaching the U.S. — where it causes about 70,000 overdose deaths annually — is made by Mexican drug cartels using precursor chemicals smuggled from Asia. On immigration, the U.S. Border Patrol reported 1.53 million encounters with migrants at the southwest border with Mexico between October 2023 and September 2024. That compares to 23,721 encounters at the Canadian border during that time. Canada is the top export destination for 36 U.S. states. Nearly $3.6 billion Canadian (US$2.7 billion) worth of goods and services cross the border each day. About 60% of U.S. crude oil imports are from Canada, and 85% of U.S. electricity imports as well. Canada is also the largest foreign supplier of steel, aluminum and uranium to the U.S. and has 34 critical minerals and metals that the Pentagon is eager for and investing for national security.

Juan Soto says he wants to help Mets 'grow a dynasty' at introductory news conference(ANNews) – When respected Fort McMurray-based Métis entrepreneur and artist Lisa Marie Bourque unexpectedly died in an April vehicle collision, Alberta’s chief medical examiner originally categorized it as a suicide. But after Bourque’s family requested a fatality inquiry, the examiner changed the manner of death to accidental—a move the family’s lawyer said is unprecedented in his experience. “I have not seen this type of amendment by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner before in my years in legal practice and so this in my opinion is an extraordinary outcome to our request for a fatality inquiry into the circumstances of Lisa’s passing,” lawyer Alex Yiu wrote in an email to Bourque’s common law spouse, Manferd Bishop, who provided it to Alberta Native News. Bourque died on April 27 after she crashed into a water truck that was parked on Highway 69, with the immediate cause of death listed in the coroner’s report as “blunt chest injuries.” She was 47. As the founder of the Fort McMurray Métis Trading Post and the New Dawn Métis Women’s representative for Region 1 of the Métis Nation of Alberta (MNA), Bourque was a high-profile member of the Métis community in Alberta and a regular fixture at cultural events in the region. “You talk to anybody from Fort Chip, McMurray, Anzac, Conklin, Janvier, Lac La Biche, everybody knows her. There isn’t one person who thought she committed suicide,” said Bishop, who owns a towing company in Fort Mac. When Bourque died, the MNA issued a statement on Facebook calling Bourque “a beacon of light, tirelessly advocating for Indigenous rights and sharing her beautiful culture with unwavering pride.” “Her absence leaves a void that will be felt deeply at every gathering, every event, every moment where her infectious smile and boundless energy once filled the room,” the statement added. In a separate statement, McMurray Métis Local 1935 described Bourque as a “a champion for sharing her culture and advocating for the rights of all Indigenous people.” “She was at many events, whether it was to celebrate or advocate. Always beaming with pride for her culture, often seen standing and clapping at the back of the room while kids jigged, or models showcased Indigenous fashions,” read the statement. “Her absence will be felt at every artisan market, as her smile from ear to ear won’t be there to welcome us in.” Nancy Critchley, a close friend of Bourque’s who met her when they were both vendors at Treaty Days in Fort McKay several years ago, told Alberta Native News that Bourque “would have never taken her own life.” “There’s no way, not one speck of cell in my body, that believes that she committed suicide,” said Critchley, who is supporting Bourque’s family in their efforts to get answers about her death. Bishop noted that the medical officer’s finding of suicide had a practical impact on his family, precluding him from filing an insurance claim to help pay for her funeral, since the accident was deemed to be Bourque’s own fault. Critchley, who like Bourque is Métis, said she suspects the suicide designation was an effort to conceal how state negligence caused the death of an Indigenous woman. The only reason the medical examiner changed the manner of death, she added, was because Bourque’s family asked for a fatality inquiry, which she described as “covering up a cover up.” Bishop, who isn’t Indigenous, doesn’t think the suicide designation was an attempt to cover anything up, but the result of the limited information the RCMP provided to the medical examiner. The original medical examiner’s report, which Bishop provided to Alberta Native News, cited Bourque’s “major depression” and anxiety, the presence of antidepressants in her system, clear road conditions the day of her accident and a lack of brake marks on the road as reasons her “manner of death is best classified as suicide.” The autopsy report, citing multiple eyewitnesses, noted that Bourque “veered from her lane into the lane with the parked truck, and made no attempt to swerve away or slow down.” Conceding that Bourque struggled with anxiety, Critchley questioned the medical examiner’s conclusion that Bourque was severely depressed to the extent that she would deliberately crash her car. “I know a lot of people who are majorly depressed,” said Critchley. “My friend Lisa was not majorly depressed.” On Nov. 14, lawyer Yiu sent a letter to the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) requesting a fatality inquiry into Bourque’s death, which often takes years to conclude, on Bishop’s behalf. In a Dec. 2 response to Yiu, chief medical examiner Dr. Akmal Coetzee-Khan said he conducted a “complete review of our office’s investigation” into Bourque’s death, adding that he’s received “several letters ... from friends and community members” echoing Yiu’s request. Upon reviewing the investigation into Bourque’s death with Dr. Daniel Smyk, who wrote the original medical examiner’s report, the physicians concluded “that based on the balance of probabilities, the death occurred accidentally,” Coetzee-Khan wrote to Yiu. An amended medical examiner’s report now notes that since completing its initial investigation, the OCME “received additional collateral information and background social history regarding Ms. Bourque which prompted a review of the findings and conclusions.” “There are still some aspects of the collision that are unclear, but given the new information, the manner of death has been amended to accidental,” Smyk wrote. While the original autopsy report said that Bourque “made no attempt to swerve away or slow down,” the amended version, citing an RCMP Technical Collision Investigation Report, noted that Bourque did move her foot from the accelerator pedal to the brake pedal, but by the time she did it was too late. Bishop noted that there were no traffic cones surrounding the stationary water truck, which would have provided an advance warning to Bourque to slow down. He added that police told him that there’s no legal requirement for there to be traffic cones or signage to protect drivers. Section 194 of Alberta’s Occupational Health and Safety Code requires the use of “lane control devices” if workers are put in danger of highway traffic. It doesn’t deal with risks to drivers. “I’ve towed for just under 50 years, I’ve been in McMurray just about 52 years now,” said Bishop. “The laws have to change.”

Tehran, Dec 24 (AP) Iran's government on Tuesday said it had lifted a ban on access to WhatsApp and Google Play after more than two years, the official IRNA news agency reported. The report said the country's Supreme Council of Cyber Space made the decision in a meeting led by reformist President Masoud Pezeshkian, who has vowed to remove restrictions on social media. Iran's telecommunication minister Sattar Heshemi in a post on X called the decision a “first step” in removing restrictions and said “the path will continue" — indicating the possibility of unblocking other services. Many people reached by The Associated Press across the capital, Tehran, and other cities said they had access to the services on computers but not yet on mobile phones. WhatsApp has been the third most popular messaging platform in Iran after Instagram and Telegram. The ban on WhatsApp and Google Play was put in place in 2022 during mass protests against the government over the death of a woman held by the country's morality police for allegedly violating the strictly enforced dress code. The protests calmed in 2023 after a crackdown by police and security forces that led to the death of hundreds of people and the imprisonment of thousands. Iran has blocked access to various social media platforms over the years but many people in the country use proxies and VPNs to access them. (AP) GSP (This story has not been edited by THE WEEK and is auto-generated from PTI)

BC celebrates 40th anniversary of Doug Flutie's Miracle in Miami pass with 41-21 win over NC

M&S shoppers gutted after it confirms it has axed a beloved festive flavour liqueur

Fact one: has transformed the way we enjoy our favorite songs, albums and podcasts, offering millions of tracks from virtually anywhere at your fingertips. Fact two: gone are the days of listening to filler because it's easier not to – is a playground chant that does its best to ruin the Beatles' – now you can listen to what you want, when you want. Heck, thanks to the streaming services' built-in algorithms, you can even open your horizons to stuff you've never heard of, instead of listening to for 94,584th time on the sly because Taylor Swift taught you how to feel. With so many options available, choosing the right service can feel overwhelming. Fear not, though – whether you’re an audiophile searching for the pristine sound quality that exposes Pulp's multi-channel mixing desk approach to , a completist seeking Frank Zappa's vast back catalog, or someone who wants great value for the whole -loving family, there’s a platform tailored to your needs. The best service for you depends a few things, including your budget, file quality preferences, device compatibility and whether you value personalized playlists or exclusive content. But we'll get to all of that. Relax, grab a mug or glass of something, and read on. Though and dominate the market in 2024, slightly more niche platforms such as and cater to specialized needs, such as high-resolution audio, specific sub-genres or even (whisper it) actual human advice, and relative newcomers and have their own offerings too. After extensive testing, we're going to break down the leading options, highlight key features, explore pricing tiers and evaluate extras that could sway your decision. Go ahead and (right in...) Each music streaming platform has its own unique strengths – and these might make choosing which is right for you all the easier. is the standout one-size-fits-all option, thanks to its robust free tier and exceptional personalization features like , Discover Weekly, and year-end . The service is ideal for users who love discovering new music and sharing playlists with friends on social media. , on the other hand, is perfect for those immersed in the Cupertino giant's ecosystem – so those that have an iPhone, iPad, Mac, or iPod – offering seamless integration with devices, lossless, hi-res and spatial audio, and expertly curated playlists. Love a bit of karaoke? Check out . It's free with your Music subscription and basically, it allows you to turn the vocal in almost any track right down... so that you can provide it! For audiophiles, delivers hi-fi-quality sound with its newly streamlined Individual plan, and also offers better artist royalties. is a no-brainer choice for Amazon Prime members, blending affordability with a growing library of HD and Ultra HD tracks, and excels in combining video content with audio, offering a unique appeal for those who enjoy discovering rare or niche tracks. Additionally, platforms like and Idagio cater to more specialized audiences, (people who know what they want, want it in hi-res, and can live without the social media stuff) providing high-resolution audio and a focus on classical music respectively. First up, library size and content variety are essential. Most major services boast catalogs of 80 to 100 million songs, but the availability of niche genres, podcasts (and increasingly video podcasts), live albums and other exclusive content can vary, and might make a difference. Sound quality is another crucial factor, especially if you’re an audiophile who enjoys the slightest background 'oooh' from Mick Jagger in . While most services provide standard streaming quality, platforms like Tidal and Qobuz stand out with high-resolution audio options. There have been long-term rumours of Spotify adding a HiFi service – and CEO Daniel Ek even confirmed a "deluxe" version was set to launch at some point – but so far we haven't seen it. Personalization and curated playlists can enhance your experience by helping you discover new music. Spotify is renowned for its algorithm-driven recommendations, while Apple Music emphasizes human-curated playlists from experts like DJs and artists. Device compatibility is also vital – your preferred service should work seamlessly across smartphones, smart speakers, gaming consoles and more. If you have an iPhone, Apple Music naturally integrates deeply, while Spotify works well more broadly. Offline listening is a must-have feature for travelers, and social features like playlist sharing and music discovery through friends add a layer of interactivity, with Spotify leading the charge. Pricing could be a significant factor when choosing a music streaming service. For those looking to save, Spotify and YouTube Music offer free ad-supported tiers, though these come with limitations such as lower audio quality and no offline listening. Premium plans now typically start at £9.99 or $9.99 per month, providing ad-free listening, offline downloads, and enhanced sound quality, although many services have raised prices in recent years due to inflation. Audiophile services including Tidal, Apple Music and Qobuz charge more for high-resolution audio (there's no free Apple Music tier – and the service ), but their offerings justify the extra cost for those who prioritise sound. Family plans are an excellent choice for households, offering multiple profiles for around £15 or $15 per month. Students can often enjoy discounted rates, with some services providing up to 50% off. (Here's , if you wanted that...) Bundles are also worth checking out: Amazon Music Unlimited is cheaper for Prime members, and Apple Music can be included in the Apple One subscription bundle. Many services offer free trials lasting one, three or even six months, making it easy to explore features before committing, and there may well be deals around during the holiday season. Beyond obvious differences such as price and device compatibility, there are several other things to consider. Exclusive content is a significant draw for some users. Spotify leads the way with its popular podcasts and artist exclusives, while Apple Music offers live radio and unique releases. Smaller platforms can also sometimes offer exclusive content. Podcasts and video content are increasingly important for modern streaming services. Spotify integrates podcasts seamlessly, while YouTube Music shines with its blend of video and audio. Some platforms also cater to niche audiences, such as Idagio for classical music enthusiasts or Bandcamp for those who prefer supporting independent artists by buying (and streaming) music directly. User experience is another factor. A clean interface, intuitive navigation and reliable search functionality can significantly enhance your enjoyment of the service and make discovering new music easier. Put Taylor down, you don't need to listen to her . Ultimately, the best music streaming service depends on your personal priorities and preferences, principally among them what content you want to listen to. If you value personalized playlists and social features, Spotify remains a top choice. Apple Music is a natural fit for users in the Apple ecosystem, offering high-quality audio and excellent device integration. Audiophiles might gravitate toward Tidal or Qobuz for their superior sound quality, while budget-conscious listeners might prefer Amazon Music Unlimited or YouTube Music for their affordability and unique offerings. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer to this question. The ideal service for you will depend on your sound quality needs, content preferences, and budget. Do you have one of the that supports AirPlay? That's an Apple Music thing; it works using your wi-fi to give you better quality audio. It's worth checking the spec sheet of the speaker (or speakers) you have, to better understand what might work best for you. Or, if you've just signed up for Apple Music and want to really make your playlists sing (any Bluetooth speaker will play files from your service over Bluetooth, but your home wi-fi offers better bandwidth and thus, improved audio) our guide to the is the place to head. Free trials are an excellent way to explore your options and find the platform that resonates most with your listening habits. Spotify is the biggest service around, but there are plenty of reasons to pick another option – including hi-res audio and spatial audio content, as well as wireless speakers that support AirPlay or Tidal connect, say. Happy discovering!